We can establish our own "live" labor guide based on the type of job, vehicle year, make, model, technician efficiency, etc. Labor guides are a mess at best. When using the technician time clock properly, we have rich data within each of our systems that could generate a tailored labor guide for each facility—no more blanket industry guides built from OE "new" vehicles. The "live" labor guide would provide the most accurate labor times based on our individual facilities' historical efficiency averages. I also believe this is the only way to establish realistic labor times. The system could eventually offer: Repair difficulty ratings (1–5 stars) based on time spread and complexity (convenient for advisors) Technician benchmarking tools for training and incentives. Facility vs industry average comparisons. I know there are reports to pull for tech review, etc., but this is valuable, and the information is there for this use. It could be developed and selectable from the labor guide options or offered as a comparison when estimating to show the advisor or whoever is estimating where WE stand compared to the standard guide. At that point, a decision is made to use the labor guide or the "Live" guide. In addition, instead of the labor matrix, imagine a variable per technician that would automatically allow enough time for the tech to be at their peak efficiency purely based on real historical data.